Showing posts with label language. Show all posts
Showing posts with label language. Show all posts

Monday, October 20, 2014

Math Brain vs English Brain

by Julie Homenuik

As an English major and teacher, I hear a lot of negativity about mathematics: “We’re English teachers—we can’t/don’t do math.” “Math can stay over there.” “Ugh. Math.” “You like math?” “I’m good at English, but not math.” To which I say, “Really?” I don’t believe that math and English are as disparate as some people make them out to be. So, with only a slight confirmation bias, I went to the internet to prove my claim that math and English are not opposing ends of a subject-spectrum.

One observation I have made in my teaching career is that students that do very well in English usually also do very well in math. Actually, the grades that students get in English are usually very similar to their math grades, even when they tell me that they are very good in English, but not very good at math (which in itself is an interesting perception). For this blog post, I wanted some objective evidence to validate my observations, and I found one interesting infographic based on SAT statistics that suggests that math and verbal scores on the SAT are comparable. According to the stats presented here, very few students had completely divergent scores in math and language.



The idea that math skills and English skills are divergent seems to relate to the Left Brain/Right Brain myth. People fall back on the right brain/left brain theory as if we simply work with one side of our brain when tackling certain subject areas. And then, to add insult to injury, some decide that math is associated with left brain thinking and language arts with right brain thinking. It’s absurd to think that math does not incorporate creativity or English class does not endorse logical, analytical thinking.  Luckily, the right brain/left brain theory is simply a myth that we simply like to believe because it lets us easily categorize our skills (and sometimes, I think, excuse our perceived weaknesses).



I actually see math and English as having a fair bit in common. Math is a language after all. In both math and writing, we abide by rules, order, structures, and symbols. We must interpret and analyse the information in front of us. We use numbers, rhythms, and patterns in writing just as we look for in mathematics. The skills we use in both subject areas are not divergent, but rather interconnected. For another perspective on this, I direct you to an article by Melanie Carbine, “Math and English: More in Common than Different”. She too notes the connection between math and English language.

Probably the best piece of information I came across is that having a strong English teacher actually makes students stronger in mathematics. Stanford researchers determined that “students of good language arts teachers had higher than expected math scores in subsequent years” (“Stanford research shows long-run benefit of English instruction”). I would think, then, that being strong in English also leads to stronger skills in mathematics—which can also be seen in the SAT stats as well since so few students who scored well in verbal did poorly in math. Therefore, with regards to all my English major math-naysayers who claim they are math-impaired, I say they are actually well-equipped to tackle mathematics (so stop dissing it!)