Sunday, May 29, 2016

Math Stations

Last year, I was teaching grade 8 French Immersion. This was definitely out of my comfort zone, at the time. I trained at the P/J level, but then was hired to teach high school, and did so for two years, until I was moved to a grade 8 classroom for a year before being moved back to high school. That year was one of the most challenging years of my short teaching career. However, it was the year in which I probably grew the most as a teacher.

At first, I was struggling to keep my head above water. I was now teaching 10 different subjects a week, when I was initially told I'd be a multi-grade math specialist. Needless to say, many lessons became teacher-led lesson followed by practice. My lessons were boring and I was giving students a lot of work.

So once I got into the groove of things, I decided I wanted to do my entire geometry unit using student-centered stations, allowing me to work one-on-one with students and taking the entire teaching focus off of me. That was the scary part. I didn't do any formal teaching. I grew to love it and my students loved the independence.

So how did this work?

I started by taking my outcomes and grouping them into key ideas. I had five stations:

  1. Rectangular Prisms
  2. Triangular Prisms
  3. Cylinders
  4. Composite Figures
  5. Enrichment
At each station, I had six folders:
  1. Visual Explanation
  2. Written Explanation (in both English and in French)
  3. Video Explanation (often from YouTube)
  4. Game
  5. Practice #1
  6. Practice #2
Students could start at whatever station they wanted. Many started with "Rectangular Prisms." At each station, students had to show evidence of trying to learn the content in at least three different ways (of the six... I counted "Practice" as one of the ways of learning). Then, once they showed this evidence (using a tracking card), they could attempt a quiz. Quiz days were Tuesdays and Thursdays. They needed to get 100% on the quiz before moving on to another station. If they didn't get 100%, they had to go back and try another way of learning (even if it was a dumb calculation error... this way, many students would use one of the two practices for the initial three pieces of evidence). I would track their success with stickers. Since there were really four primary stations, we worked on this unit for four weeks. Students thus had four weeks, working at their own pace, before the unit test. 

What I noticed with this method was that students were initially more off-task (the first time I used the stations, they had more time, so many slacked off). However, by the time they got to the unit test, they were so much more confident and more consistent with their work. The class average was about 10% higher than units that were primarily teacher-centered. 

I know my system has flaws, but for a first-time trial, I'd say it was a huge success. I managed to do a stations-method unit for our numbers strand, too. Students loved this set-up and asked to keep using it throughout the year. 

Unfortunately, being given another teaching load this year of new courses, I haven't been able to try flipping my classroom or using these stations. But! I do get to teach the grade 11 math course again next year, so I have more time to think about where stations would fit in nicely (I'm thinking quadratics, for sure). 

Have you used stations in senior math courses? How did they go? Any tips or tricks?








 








2 comments:

  1. I can totally relate to you being bounced around and teaching something that is out of your comfort zone! I agree that those years have been the most formative for me too!

    I think that your idea of math stations is a great idea! Working in elementary (kindergarten, 4/5, and 6/7), I have also used math stations a lot. If stations are something that are introduced well in primary and junior grades, I don't see why they wouldn't work in intermediate and even senior grades.


    Some things to consider/new ideas :)

    I like that students need to 'master' the station before they can move on, but I fear that some students wouldn't ever get past the first or second station. What might happen then? Or would those be the students that you are working more closely with while the others are working independently?

    Would you consider have a station that students needed to work collaboratively at?

    Are a variety of learning styles mixed throughout the stations? (eg., visual, auditory, kinesthetic)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hello,

    Thanks for this thoughtful post. It really got me excited for changing up my courses in the future. I try to avoid the Teacher led discussions but find that there is just so much material to cover that I need to be giving the guidance and then allow time for students to practice the skills. This systems has worked for me but I know it is not ideal...

    I like how you have split the curriculum into four sections and then given practice with it to make six total sections. I also like the variety within each. This idea reminds me of a gamification course I took at Queens U and think these two ideas would go well together.

    I shall attempt to explain my idea with blending Gamification with your idea.
    Gamification is the idea of adding elements of gaming into the classroom. So a sticker for completing homework or for attending extra help. When you get to a certain point value, there are rewards. Sometimes it can be something small like the removal of one wrong MC option to a question or bigger like having a cue card with info on it for your assessment. You are currently using stickers to track progress which works but you could add a new level for those who go above and complete all tasks within a section. When they get to a certain point value (sticker count) then they can unlock more options such as Kinesthetic learning tools or a hands-on activity. (As I wrote this, I wondered if it is "fair" to do something like this...) Or how about an extension option. The Senior students are often looking for ways to extend their knowledge or to show you they have mastered the skill. This may be a great way to do it.

    As C Watson commented, I think a collaborative station is extremely important in the learning process but makes it more challenging to get the students to do this within the classroom setting. I also worry about the students who become stuck. I think this system allows you to work with these students more closely but worry that the students will become frustrated and just give up on the activity/station.

    - Would you consider opening all units at the same time and allowing students to pick the unit and then the stations?
    - What do you do if a student speeds through all the stations within the first week? What do they do for the following three weeks while they wait for classmates to catch up and take the test?

    Thank you for sharing this idea and how you have used it in your classroom. As mentioned, I really like this and feel inspired to integrate it into my teaching method in the near future.
    Chris

    ReplyDelete